July 21


Can Brian May And Queen Stop Donald Trump From Using Their Music?

By Keith Livingston

July 21, 2016

ASCAP, BMI, performance royalties, PROs, publishing, royalies, royalty

At the Republican national convention, Donald Trump entered with Queen’s “We Are The Champions” playing. Brian May called this an “unauthorized use” and said that Trump had not asked permission to use the song.

Can Brian May or Queen (or whoever owns the publishing) legally stop Trump from using their music? Is there legal recourse?

Can Queen Shut Trump Down With Copyright Laws?

Probably not, you might be surprised to learn.

While there are various copyright laws that have to do with music, this particular instance falls under what’s called “public performance” copyright law. If a song is performed publicly, the owners of the rights to the song (usually the songwriters and record/publishing company) are supposed to get paid. That’s true if the song is played on the radio, or in a restaurant, or at a political convention.

Usually, that responsibility falls to the venue.

How Performance Royalies Work

Radio stations keep track of which songs they play, and the royalties are distributed on that basis. But venues typically don’t track every song. They usually purchase what’s called a blanket license. A blanket license conveys the right for the venue to play pretty much any song. The venue buys the license from folks that collect performance royalties.

The folks that collect performance royalties are called PROs (Performing Rights Organizations), and include entities such as ASCAP and BMI. “We Are The Champions” is a BMI song.

So, the venue in this case (the Quicken Loans Arena in Cleveland), most likely has a blanket license which covers the song being played in the convention hall. If the Trump campaign has used the song in several locations, they may have purchased a license, as well. The would contact BMI to do this, and wouldn’t have to contact Queen.

Synch Licensing

If Trump used the song in a commercial, he’d had to get a different kind of license (a synch license), which he’d have to negotiate, and it sounds like it would be denied.

There may be some legal recourse, as there are other protections besides copyright laws. But as far as copyright goes, Trump’s people are probably in the clear. However, they’ll probably stop using the song, as it’s now negative publicity for them.

Keith (The Do-It-Yourself Musician)

PS: I’m not a lawyer, and none of this should be considered legal advice 🙂


Keith Livingston

About the author

Keith Livingston started recording his own music in the late '70s, on a 4-track. He worked his way into live sound and studio work as an engineer -- mixing in arenas, working on projects in many major studios as a producer/engineer, and working in conjunction with an independent label.

He taught audio engineering at the Art Institute of Seattle, from 1990-1993, and in '96, contributing to authoring several college-level courses there.

He was General Manager of Радио один (Radio 1) in St. Petersburg, Russia.

Now he spends his time recording his own songs wherever he roams, and teaching others to do the same.

You might also like

More Music Marketing Mistakes — Goals & Strategy
Music Marketing Mistakes
ROI For Musicians — What Is It And Why Do You Need It?
Selling Swag, Perks, & Promoting A Cause
Music Isn’t Valued — What Can You Do?
People Who Won’t Pay $.99 For Your Download
Super-fans & Regular Fans
When To Ignore Feedback On Your Music
Music Marketer Suggests Possible Copyright Violations
Adding A Donate Button
Resonate Your Vibe
Musicians — Take Your Power Back
Are You A Commodity, Or Something Special?
Should Your Music Website Front Page Be A Squeeze Page?
Protect Your Fans
Volume, Volume, Volume: Why you need to put out a lot of music (and other content)
Your Ideal Fan
Making An End Card For Your YouTube Videos
Nobody Gives A Rat’s Ass About Your Music
{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}